SNUL: The Eternal Mystery of Liberalism

I got nothin’ much these days, so here’s this:

When you can satisfactorily explain the appeal of Hillary Clinton, you will fathom the liberal mind.

I’m not being sarcastic here.  I understand the following reasons for supporting her candidacy:

  • She’s got dirt on you (this explains half the DNC).
  • She’s going to keep the graft gravy train rolling (this explains the other half).
  • She’s not Donald Trump (remember, MPAI – for lots of folks, politics is sportsball and the Dems are “our team”).
  • You’re a single-issue voter (feminist, abortion zealot).

But those are all tactical choices (for values of “tactical” that include the knee-jerk partisanship of the numbnuts low-info voters that are the majority of both parties’ bases).  But lots of folks sure seemed to be truly, madly, deeply in love with the concept of Hillary Clinton, specifically, as president of the United States.

If you can explain how this reptilian criminal got herself a personality cult without actually having a personality, you have explained modern Leftism.

Loading Likes...

5 thoughts on “SNUL: The Eternal Mystery of Liberalism

  1. Anonymous White Male

    The “left” is a cult. The “right” can be (see George Will, et. al), but there actually exists a tendency on those from the “right” to validate their experience based on reality, not on a pixie dust universe that either becomes what you “want” or you become what the Tinkerbell universe wants you to be. This is another reason the “left” throws around the phrase that they are on “the right side of history”. This is a self-righteous conceit that allows them to take religious satisfaction on all the inevitable failures that their ideology results in. Take Hitlery. The future is female, right? This is what the “universe” points to. So, it was a foregone conclusion that the dyke would win. When she didn’t, the “left” acted just like a cult member that had walked in on the cult’s messiah poking a ten year old girl, after claiming that celibacy was the way to achieve self-control. So much wrong with that vision. But, the cultist then has a choice. He can either pull his head out of his ass and admit he was completely wrong about his “religion”, or he can double down when the cult leader tells him his penis can cure this little girls infection. He was just doing what any concerned doctor would have done. When the hag lost, the “left” was shocked. Their “religious” beliefs were not authenticated by reality. If you read r/K theory, it can be explained via the amygdala and dopamine levels. To avoid feeling like an idiot for being so stupid, the “left” is now doubling down to become a resistance force. They just weren’t “holy” enough, due to their sins. So now, they steel their spines and hit the streets to punch Nazi’s or they retreat to their safe spaces to enhance their purity.

  2. P_Ang

    I tried asking my (extremely liberal but insists she’s midline) sister this very question. The first answer I got was “she’s like Obama!” The second answer I got after I questioned Hillary’s ethics was “well, Donald Trump is worse!” Both of these can easily fit into the third point. Simply put, Hillary is “Not a Republican.” Because as we know, if Jesus ran as a Republican, and Hitler ran as a Democrat, more than half of those little boogers would vote for Hitler. The papers would all declare Hitler was a “changed man.” Colbert would be throwing Nazi salutes in earnest with absolutely no sense of either irony or shame. Democrats would claim Martin Scorcese’s account of Jesus sleeping around with Mary Magdalene to be base fact. (And suddenly they’d be chaste about such things again.)

  3. Robert M Mitchell Jr.

    I think that her very baseness is the heart of it. If Hillary! could do it, there’s hope for them. They can all see themselves as her, there’s no charm or skill or wisdom, nothing special about Hillary, and much that is wrong. If she, as lazy and unaccomplished as she is, could get the Gold Ring, then their lives have not be wasted……..

  4. guest

    Any comment on?

    Catholics Need Not Apply? Senators Accused of Anti-Catholic Bias at Hearing for Judicial Nominee

    “Did Senator Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., attack a federal appeals court nominee for her Roman Catholic faith? Critics claim she did during a Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing this week.

    “When you read your speeches, the conclusion one draws is that the dogma (Catholic) lives loudly within you,” Feinstein, the top-ranking Democrat on the committee, said to Barrett. “And that’s of concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for for years in this country.”

    The irony is once again lost, that an ultra liberal party hack like Feinstein, accuses others of bias, i guess they do always project!

    1. Severian

      Not surprising. Only Christians have dogma, you see. Not Muslims, or ISIS — who aren’t Muslims, no siree!! — and certainly not Liberals like Feinstein. Because dogma is Bad, and Liberals are Good. Just ask ’em!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *