The Five-Hour B.A.

Here’s a fun game to play if you’re bored and suicidal.  In case you don’t want to wade through that, Vox Day has randomized all the phrases in an award-winning work of modern “literature.” As they all make equal sense — zero — you’re invited to guess as to which one made it to the published page.

You can do the same thing with academic “literature,” too.  Jonah Goldberg used to quote PoMos like Judith Butler a lot:

The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to structure social relations in relatively homologous ways to a view of hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition, convergence, and rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the thinking of structure, and marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as theoretical objects to one in which the insights into the contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed conception of hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies of the rearticulation of power.

Here, too, feel free to randomize the phrases and recombine them, Dada-style.*  It makes just as much sense, I promise.  As Goldberg points out at length, communication has nothing to do with this; all those big words are supposed to beat you down, so that you meekly go along with the author’s political platform (“vote Hillary.”  Yes, even back then).

The reason professors do this kind of thing is, of course, capitalism — you’ll never make tenure if you don’t publish, and since Shakespeare ain’t writing no more sonnets, the only way to say something new is to expand the definition of “literature” (or whatever) past the point of meaninglessness.  This is true of all the Humanities save History** — it has all been said before, no later than the 19th century in most cases and always far, far better.  In fact, if you want the equivalent education to a modern BA, you can do it in about five hours.  Ready?

Read Nietzsche — pretty much anything will do, but I recommend Beyond Good and Evil — and James Joyce (again, pretty much anything will do.  If you want to slog through Ulysses or, God save us, Finnegan’s Wake, be my guest, but A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man will get you there, and it’s actually sorta comprehensible).  Modern academics, you see, believe in only two things: Words and Power.  Whether Words create Power, or vice versa, determines what flavor of egghead you are, but the basic idea is the same.  They got this from Derrida, who got it from Foucault, who got it from Nietzsche, who wrote crystal-clear prose.  To make themselves sound all deep and original, they had to take ol’ Fred’s basic insight and gussy it up past the point of incomprehensibility….

….which works, because if there is nothing but Words and Power, then it follows that only the form of the Words matter.  Which is literary Modernism, which is Joyce.

Give it a whirl.  Submit your final exams in the comments.

 

*Back when that was new and edgy, Dadaist “writers” actually did that — they wrote a story, then cut the individual sentences out of the page, scrambled them, and pasted them onto a new page.  Because “art is dead” or something.

** And only there because new evidence can always come to light.

3 thoughts on “The Five-Hour B.A.

  1. In college English we used to call that “professor-speak.” Everyone had to use it or fail. It didn’t matter if your words actually MEANT anything, they just had to flow beautifully and confound, stupefy, and amaze your opponent.

    Interestingly enough, my first experience with that was the Dr. Demento show and the “Ronald Reagan rap.” I’m not sure if he actually SAID the words, but I remember the phrase, “The political, social, and economic factors are in direct cohesion to that which has been facilitated…in other words, yes.” Of course the songwriters never did relate the question the ‘quote’ was referring to…

    • That’s why I never stop recommending the Postmodern Essay Generator. I’m sure the engineering types among the Seven Regular Readers could easily modify it to where your paper includes course-specific terms. Heck, the one I got on my most recent click — “Reassessing Modernism: Nationalism and deconstructive theory” — would get you an A in every graduate seminar in the land, regardless of topic.

  2. The Genre of Reality: The dialectic paradigm of expression and Marxist
    socialism

    The 8th Regular Reader
    Department of Sociology, Carnegie-Mellon University

    1. Fellini and textual theory
    “Sexual identity is intrinsically responsible for sexism,” says Lacan;
    however, according to Werther[1] , it is not so much sexual
    identity that is intrinsically responsible for sexism, but rather the rubicon,
    and subsequent economy, of sexual identity. Therefore, the characteristic theme
    of the works of Fellini is the fatal flaw, and therefore the defining
    characteristic, of postdialectic sexuality.

    I had forgotten about this generator; thanks for the link.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *